« November 2006 | Main

January 05, 2007

An Interesting Idea...!!!

Pigeons: The Ultimate Urban Survivors
(by Michelle Stripling)

They are clearly the most visible form of urban structure. Take a visit to any city and you're almost guaranteed to see them. Adorning statues, fountains, parks, buildings, bridges, and other structures, pigeons have become a permanent fixture of urban landscapes, typically London. They can be found on the front steps of Central Libraries and are waiting beside park benches for handouts from visitors, young and old alike.

Pigeons have been remarkably successful in adapting to urban environments. They thrive in the most unlikely of habitats, a concrete jungle that naturally supports very little life. Yet, pigeons have found a way to coexist in close proximity with man in these areas and, remarkably, to rely on man's structures and garbage for food, water, and shelter.

Perhaps something to ponder...

Urban Structures Could be described as…

People
Bridges
Infrastructure
Transportation
Cities
Dust Bins
Walkways
Park benchs
Public ‘space’
Districts
Settlements
Structures
Canyons
Pyramids
Gardens
Temples
Lampposts
Statues
Parks
Buildings
Fountains
Lighthouses
Roads
Telegraph Poles
Etc, the list goes on!

Urban Structures are perhaps:

Man-made?
Artificial?
Unknown?
Everything?
Everyone?
Policies?
Rules?
Everywhere?


Some of these structures allow for things to take place, others are allowed to happen with larger conditions.

What they all have in common is that they shape our living environment, whether they are material or immaterial.

Back To the Brief

Urban Structure Definition...

Urban structure is the arrangement of land use in urban areas. Sociologists, economists, and geographers have developed several models, explaining where different types of people and businesses tend to exist within the urban setting.

(From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

...This model was the first to explain distribution of social groups within urban areas. Based on one single city, Chicago, it was created by sociologist E. W. Burgess in 1923. According to this model, a city grows outward from a central point in a series of rings. The innermost ring represents the central business district. It is surrounded by a second ring, the zone of transition, which contains industry and poorer-quality housing. The third ring contains housing for the working-class and is called the zone of independent workers' homes. The fourth ring has newer and larger houses usually occupied by the middle-class. This ring is called the zone of better residences. The outermost ring is called the commuter's zone. This zone represents people who choose to live in residential suburbs and take a daily commute into the CBD to work.

A second theory of urban structure was proposed in 1939 by an economist named Homer Hoyt. His model, the sector model, proposed that a city develops in sectors instead of rings. Certain areas of a city are more attractive for various activities, whether by chance or geographic and environmental reasons. As the city grows and these activities flourish and expand outward, they do so in a wedge and become a sector of the city. If a district is set up for high income housing, for example, any new development in that district will expand from the outer edge.
To some degree this theory is just a refinement on the concentric model rather than a radical restatement. Both Hoyt and Burgess claimed Chicago supported their model. Burgess claimed that Chicago's central business district was surrounded by a series of rings, broken only by Lake Michigan. Hoyt argued that the best housing developed north from the central business district along Lake Michigan, while industry located along major rail lines and roads to the south, southwest, and northwest.


Geographers C.D. Harris and E. L. Ullman developed the multiple nuclei model in 1945. According to this model, a city contains more than one center around which activities revolve. Some activities are attracted to particular nodes while others try to avoid them. For example, a university node may attract well-educated residents, pizzerias, and bookstores, whereas an airport may attract hotels and warehouses. Incompatible land use activities will avoid clustering in the same area, explaining why heavy industry and high-income housing rarely exist in the same neighbourhood.

(From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)